3. METHODS
3.1 THE FIELD WORK, CHEMICAL ANALYSES AND SPECIES SCORING.
The samples were token in the period of 21‑8‑'84 to 7‑9‑'84. The sampling sites were chosen on the basis of the vegetation types, aiming to cover as much as variation as possible. By means of aereal photographs, the position of each sampling site was located, in order to enable comparison in the future. At each sampling site, a relevee of the vegetation was made. The size of the relevee depended on the size of the homogeneous part of the vegetation of the sampling site. In flarks or hollows the size of the relevee was usually about 4m2, but in spring areas it could be only 1m2 . The abundance of the vegetation was expressed in a percentage scale. Species present in the same kind of vegetation nearby scored 1, species within the relevee that covered 2% or less always scored a value of 2. On each site a water sample for chemical analyses was token, in a glass bottle of 200 ml. As the samples would be analysed in Amsterdam, we had to take precautions to prevent the chemical composition of the samples from being changed by biological activity. Therefor we filtered them in a capsule with a micropore‑filter, put under pressure by a foot‑pomp. The samples were stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C. In order to make pH and conductivity analyses in the very evening, a 150 ml plastic bottle was filled with filtered water. If there was a relatively large variation of substrate for the desmids to grow on, e.g. different moss species or parts of the bottom not covered by plants, samples were token of these different substrates. On each site, attention was paid to features like presence of iron deposits, which could be seen by a reddish colour of the bottom, presence of iron bacteries which form a bluish oil‑like film on the water surface, water movement, thickness of the sampled algal layer, depth of the sampled water and depth on which the samples were token. In the evening of the sampling day, the pH and the conductivity of the sampled sites were measured with field meters. 40%‑Formol was added to the algal samples, to reach a final concentration of about 4%. Three months after sampling, the chemical analyses were carried out at the Hugo de Vries laboratory in Amsterdam.
Algal samples were counted by means of a Zeiss microscope. A magnification of 125x was used to search the slide, and species were usually identified at a magnification of 500x. Drawings were made by means of a drawing tube at a 2000x magnification, or 1000x‑ 250x if the species were relatively large. Species scoring was done until the number of 100 specimens was reached. Often one or more species occurred abundantly in a sample: up to 95% of the counted specimens could concern a single species. In order to avoid a strong reduction of the number of counted species, only the first 10 specimens of a species were counted for the total of 100 specimens at which the species scoring was stopped. However, the remaining specimens were still recorded, so that, in fact, the final number of cells counted exceded the 100 cells. When the total was reached, I examined the slide at a more quick rate for not‑counted species, which were noted as "+". Consequently the larger‑sized species were more likely to be noted in this way. Finally the numbers of specimens counted for each species were expressed in percentages. Samples very poor in desmids were counted as far as possible.
3.2 CLASSIFICATION
The resulting 194 counting lists ('desmid‑relevees'), belonging to 164 sites (table 12, 13 ) were processed by various clustering methods. All analyses were done with the program package CLUSTAN (Wishart 1978). The amount of species that could be processed is 200. As I counted more than 450 species, I had to reduce the number. Therefore I removed all species that occurred less than 8 times in the total of 194 samples, and also species of which the identification caused problems. To avoid too much influence of species with high scores, the percentage scale was transformed to an octave scale (Gauch, 1977). As many countings comprised more than 100 specimens, I also transformed the scale of Gauch by multiplying it with 1.25 (table 1). Otherwise for example much species which scored a value of 2 would be classified with a value of 1, the same class of species that scored '+'.
Table 1.Transformation of the species scores to an octave scale (Gauch, 1977)
species score (x)
In %
octave value 0
0
0
<
x
<
0,4
1
0,4
<
x
<
0,8
2
0,8
<
x
<
1,7
3
1,7
<
x
<
3,4
4
3,4
<
x
<
6,8
5
6,8
<
x
<
13,6
6
13,6
<
x
<
27,1
7
27,1
<
x
<
54,2
8
54,2
<
x
<
100
9
The data were processed in three ways (see table 2):
In order determine ecological relationships between the individual desmid species, 'octave' and 'binary' clusterings were also carried out for the desmid species. Therefore the axis of the previous clusterings were exchanged. Again Ward's method was used for calculating the similarities.
Likewise, the macrophyte vegetation relevees were clustered.
An analysis of variance was carried out on the chemical parameters (table 5).
Table 2. Survey of the clustering methods used.
Clustering method |
scale |
n species |
|
hierarchic fusion |
octave |
200 |
|
hierarchic fusion |
binary |
200 |
|
relocation |
octave |
200 |